Move UStack to ustl

[bleudev]

closes #40

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request renames UStack to Stack throughout the codebase, including updates to the documentation and test cases. Additionally, it simplifies the setup.py script.

• Enhancements:
  • Renamed UStack to Stack across the codebase for consistency and clarity.
• Documentation:
  • Updated documentation to reflect the renaming of UStack to Stack.
• Tests:
  • Modified test cases to use Stack instead of UStack.
• Chores:
  • Simplified the setup.py script by removing the __package function and directly using find_packages().

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request renames the UStack class to Stack throughout the codebase, including updates to the documentation and test cases. Additionally, it simplifies the setup.py script by using find_packages().

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
tests/test_ustack.py ufpy/ustack.py examples/ustack.md	Renamed UStack to Stack across the codebase, including tests and documentation.
setup.py	Simplified the setup.py script by using find_packages() and removing redundant package definitions.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 5 issues found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 5 issues found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟡 Documentation: 2 issues found

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[bleudev]

@sourcery-ai review

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
• 🟡 Documentation: 4 issues found

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[bleudev]

@sourcery-ai review

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
• 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
• 🟡 Documentation: 1 issue found

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}