Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

action/ubuntu: fp16 on/off handled by matrix #2647

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

myungjoo
Copy link
Member

To de-dup scripts handling fp16-enabled and fp16-disabled cases for meson-clean build, add another matrix entry.

Reference: https://github.com/nnstreamer/nntrainer/pull/2641/files#r1646986341

CC: @heka1024

To de-dup scripts handling fp16-enabled and fp16-disabled
cases for meson-clean build, add another matrix entry.

Reference: https://github.com/nnstreamer/nntrainer/pull/2641/files#r1646986341

Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <[email protected]>
@taos-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

taos-ci commented Jun 20, 2024

📝 TAOS-CI Version: 1.5.20200925. Thank you for submitting PR #2647. Please a submit 1commit/1PR (one commit per one PR) policy to get comments quickly from reviewers. Your PR must pass all verificiation processes of cibot before starting a review process from reviewers. If you are new member to join this project, please read manuals in documentation folder and wiki page. In order to monitor a progress status of your PR in more detail, visit http://ci.nnstreamer.ai/.

Copy link
Collaborator

@taos-ci taos-ci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@myungjoo, 💯 All CI checkers are successfully verified. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@heka1024 heka1024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we said in #2560 (comment) that the Fp16 build should be optional. But I think this pull request make a build on fp16 as required. Should we make it required?

@myungjoo
Copy link
Member Author

myungjoo commented Jun 21, 2024

I think we said in #2560 (comment) that the Fp16 build should be optional. But I think this pull request make a build on fp16 as required. Should we make it required?

fp16 build should be kept optional. Users should be able to enable/disable fp16 for their own build.

fp16 compatibility should be kept mandatory. Any commit should NEVER break fp16 support, which will keep users being able to enable/disable fp16 for their own build. Without this mandate, users won't be able to enable fp16 in the near future.

Copy link
Contributor

@heka1024 heka1024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems much nicer. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@DonghakPark DonghakPark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's much better !! LGTM!!

Copy link
Contributor

@djeong20 djeong20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@SeoHyungjun SeoHyungjun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@myungjoo myungjoo merged commit 74f5086 into nnstreamer:main Jun 25, 2024
38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants