Added exporter

[fadiga]

Fixes #77

[kelson42]

At which stage the quality assessment of this new feed will be checked (against current one)?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (7354663) compared to base (237bd5e).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 7354663 differs from pull request most recent head b045584. Consider uploading reports for the commit b045584 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #90   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        17    +2     
  Lines          544       567   +23     
=========================================
+ Hits           544       567   +23     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
backend/src/backend/constants.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
backend/src/backend/exporters/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...end/src/backend/exporters/kiwix_public_exporter.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[rgaudin]

See inline comments.
Also, there's a conflict that you should look into (rebase from master) as nobody else works on this.

I'll add a ticket to add a trigger for this as we'll need to test this live as well

[rgaudin]

I believe we agreed on testing the check_and_upload_file call in the tests like missing file to upload or incorrect UPLOAD_URI.

I also notice that there are warnings in the tests output regarding calls that were not awaited. This should be fixed (although it may originate from previous code).

Making sure upload status is reported is important ; see inline comments

[rgaudin]

See inline comments

[rgaudin]

Thanks ; it's almost there but we need to test that common problems (namely our inputs) are caught, otherwise tests are not as useful:

• incorrect URL should fail
• incorrect RSA key should fail

[rgaudin]

See inline comment ; either the test or its name is incorrect