Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor output format framework to support tables and empty format #1548

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Refactor output format framework to support tables and empty format #1548

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gowriswarupk
Copy link
Contributor

Motiviation

Addressing issue #1429

Changes made:


  • feat Output Format supports 'table' and 'none' output types. [1]

Verification Steps:


-./rhoas kafka topic create --name test --output none
-./rhoas kafka topic list --output table

@gowriswarupk gowriswarupk changed the title Refactor output format framework to support tables and empty format #1540 Refactor output format framework to support tables and empty format Apr 29, 2022
go install github.com/redhat-developer/app-services-go-linter/cmd/app-services-go-linter@latest
endif
app-services-go-linter -path ./pkg/core/localize/locales ./...
.PHONY: lint-lang
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should not be there./

@@ -4,21 +4,26 @@ go 1.16

require (
github.com/AlecAivazis/survey/v2 v2.3.4
github.com/BurntSushi/toml v1.0.0
github.com/BurntSushi/toml v1.1.0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WE should not update those

@wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator

wtrocki commented May 3, 2022

Needs addressing comments from here:
#1540

@wtrocki
Copy link
Collaborator

wtrocki commented May 25, 2022

@rkpattnaik780 WDYT about this PR. I think we could drive that to main branch with some minimal work.

@rkpattnaik780
Copy link
Contributor

@rkpattnaik780 WDYT about this PR. I think we could drive that to main branch with some minimal work.

That will be great. Few changes need to be made and should be properly tested before merging.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants