Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 🐛 Fix Bedrock Converse's tool use blocks, when there are multiple consecutive function calls #14386

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AndreCNF
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Sometimes BedrockConverse would fail when trying to load a chat history that had consecutive function calls. This is because function calls weren't being checked in messages that are tool results.

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Added new unit/integration tests
  • Added new notebook (that tests end-to-end)
  • I stared at the code and made sure it makes sense

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nerdai nerdai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this makes sense @AndreCNF. Thanks for contributing fix. Am wondering if possible to either add a brief comment in the code regarding the error case we're trying to remedy, or perhaps even a better a small unit test for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants