Skip to content

The comparison of general purposes java micro- frameworks for microservices

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

sanogotech/java-frameworks-comparison

 
 

Repository files navigation

Colesico-Framework 3.7 vs Micronaut 2.0 vs Quarkus 1.5 vs Spring Boot 2.3 Benchmark - 2020

Performance, memory consumption and jar size comparison between:

  • Colesico-Framework 3.7
  • Micronaut 2.0
  • Quarkus 1.5
  • Spring Boot 2.3

Benchmark tests performed on:

  • JDK 14 on Ubuntu 20.04 Mate 1.24
  • 15 Gb RAM
  • Intel® Core™ i7-10510U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 8
  • SSD

This tests based on code form tests by Graeme Rocher, author of Micronaut framework: https://github.com/graemerocher/framework-comparison-2020

Description

Test projects of each framework were built with standard maven 3.6.3.

The number of requests per second was measured with 'ab' and 'wrk' tool:

ab -k -c 20 -n 1000000 http://localhost:8080/hello/John
wrk -t12 -c400 -d30s --latency http://localhost:8080/hello/John

Memory measured with VisualVM GUI.

Results

Colesico vs Micronaut vs Quarkus vs Spring Boot Benchmark Results

About

The comparison of general purposes java micro- frameworks for microservices

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Languages

  • Java 77.9%
  • HTML 21.1%
  • Dockerfile 1.0%