Skip to content

This a simple document that provides a clear and versatile Git workflow for team collaboration on projects.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

udohjeremiah/Git-Plus-Hub-Flow

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

10 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

THE GIT+HUB FLOW

This document provides a clear and versatile Git workflow that teams can use to collaborate on projects. We call this workflow the Git+Hub Flow, which combines the advantages of both the Github Workflow for continuous deployment and the Gitflow Workflow for release deployment.

Note that continuous deployment is a strategy where features are deployed as soon as they're ready, while release deployment is a strategy where features are bundled into a release and then deployed all at once.

If you're unfamiliar with the most commonly used Git workflows, we highly recommend reading the following articles in the given order. This will help you understand where the Git+Hub Flow fits in and the potential advantages it offers:

So, what is the Git+Hub Flow?

  • Anything in the main branch is deployable (the continuous part).

  • The release-vX.Y branch is a copy of main at a specific point in time (the release part).

  • To work on new features or changes that need to be made to main (excluding bug fixes), create a branch off of main with a descriptive name. This name should typically include the name of the team involved at the beginning of the branch name. For example, senior-devs/ui-upgrade, or junior-devs/ui-upgrade. If a single person is making the change, they can create a branch with no team name, optionally including their name, such as john/ui-upgrade or simply ui-upgrade.

  • Once changes have been merged and pushed to main, the feature branch should be deleted, and you can deploy immediately if necessary.

  • At a periodic interval or based on stated time or how the software is released, create a branch from main named release-vX.Y and tag it as a stable release.

  • If a bug is found in main, create a branch from it and name it hotfix-main#<ID>. After fixing the bug, merge hotfix-main#<ID> into main, and delete the hotfix branch.

  • If a bug is found in release-vX.Y, create a branch from it and name it bugfix-vX.Y#<ID>. After fixing the bug, merge bugfix-vX.Y#<ID> into release-vX.Y, and delete the bugfix branch. Note that, depending on the severity of the bug, if it is critical and there is a possibility of it also existing in main, then a hotfix-main#<ID> branch should be created from main. The bug should also be fixed in this branch, while taking into account the changes that have occured between release-vX.Y and main. Once completed, the hotfix-main#<ID> branch should be merged into main and then deleted.

  • In summary, at its core, the central repository will always have two main branches with infinite lifetimes: main for the unstable deployable release and release-vX.Y for the stable deployable release. For projects that provide maintenance, fixes, backport, etc. for releases other than the current stable release, there can be more than one release-vX.Y branch.

  • When compared to the stable release-vX.Y branch, the main branch is considered unstable. This is because new features and changes are frequently added to it without prior notice to project users, which could potentially break existing functionality or user interactions. In contrast, release-vX.Y does not change frequently, and any necessary changes will be announced to software users before they are made and/or released as a patch to release-vX.Y, ensuring stability.

Branch Protected? Created from? Only merge into? Status after merging?
main YES N/A release-vX.Y N/A
release-vX.Y YES main N/A N/A
<teamname><featurename> NO main main Delete after merge
hotfix-main#<ID> NO main main Delete after merge
bugfix-vX.Y#<ID> NO release-vX.Y release-vX.Y Delete after merge

main

This is the unstable release, which represents the latest state of development. That is, it serves as the single source of truth, meaning it's the definitive and most up-to-date version of the code for the project. This branch should always be deployable. A pull request that is reviewed is required to merge code into main.

If the project is open source, contributors without write/permission access to the central repository should fork this branch, which should already be the default branch, and start working from it locally, pushing pull requests to it.

release-vX.Y

This is the stable release. A pull request that is reviewed is required to merge code into release-vX.Y. If the branch where code is being merged from is main, then the commit should be tagged as a release.

<teamname><featurename>

If a new feature is assigned to a team, <teamname> should be provided. For instance, if the team senior-devs is working on a feature named ui-upgrade, they can create their branch from main and name it as senior-devs/ui-upgrade.

The <teamname> doesn't have to be singular. Multiple sub-teams can exist as long as they are structured hierarchically. For example, if senior developers delegate work to junior developers, they can create a branch from senior-devs/ui-upgrade and name it as junior-devs/senior-devs/ui-upgrade. Once their part of the work is done, the branch should be merged into senior-devs/ui-upgrade and deleted.

In the same vein, branches such as seniors/junior-devs/senior-devs/ui-upgrade, juniors/junior-devs/senior-devs/ui-upgrade, and so on, can be created from junior-devs/senior-devs/ui-upgrade, assuming work is further delegated by junior-devs to seniors and juniors within the junior-devs team. Each branch should work in a hierarchical structure from senior-devs/ui-upgrade to the last branch, juniors/junior-devs/senior-devs/ui-upgrade, to ensure the ui-upgrade feature is implemented. All branches should be merged into senior-devs/ui-upgrade once all work is done and then deleted.

If no team is assigned, then there can be no sub-team. Therefore, if a single person is implementing a feature, <teamname> can be omitted. Optionally, their name can be included, and a branch named after just the feature, such as john/ui-upgrade or ui-upgrade, can be created from main and worked on. The <teamname><featurename> branch should be merged into the main branch once work is completed and deleted afterwards.

hotfix-main#<ID>

This is the branch for any bug fixes against the main branch. In a typical environment, bugs should be opened as issues within the project using a hosting service (e.g. Github, Gitlab). To work on the bug, a bug fix branch should be created using the format: hotfix-main#<ID>, where ID will be the #issue-number generated by your hosting service (e.g., Github, Gitlab, etc.) when the issue was opened. For example, hotfix-main#556 is a bug fix for the main branch that fixes the bug found by issue #556. The hotfix-main#<ID> branch should be merged into the main branch and deleted afterwards.

bugfix-vX.Y#<ID>

This is the branch for any bug fixes against the release-vX.Y branch. In a typical environment, bugs should be opened as issues within the project using a hosting service (e.g. Github, Gitlab). To work on that bug, a bug fix branch should be created using the format bugfix-vX.Y#<ID>, where ID will be the #issue-number generated by your hosting service (e.g., Github, Gitlab, etc.) when the issue was opened.

For example, bugfix-v1.1#123 is a bug fix for the release-v1.1 branch that fixes the bug found by issue #123. The bugfix-vX.Y#<ID> branch should be merged into the release-vX.Y branch and deleted after.

If the bug fixed by the bugfix-v1.1#123 is critical concerning the overall project and there is a possibility that it still exists in main, a hotfix-main#123 branch should be created promptly to address and resolve the issue in main as well. When fixing the bug, it's crucial to bear in mind that changes may have occurred between the release-v1.1 and main branches, such as changes in dependency versions, platforms, architectures, and so on. Therefore, it's important to take these changes into account. Once the hotfix-main#123 branch is complete, it should be merged into main and then deleted.

Workflow Badge

Let contributors know that your project is following the Git+Hub flow by adding the badge to your README.md:

[![Workflow: Git+Hub](https://img.shields.io/badge/Workflow-Git+Hub%20Flow-F05032?logo=git&logoColor=red)](https://github.com/udohjeremiah/Git-Plus-Hub-Flow)

About

This a simple document that provides a clear and versatile Git workflow for team collaboration on projects.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages