Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Principle on fake consent #290

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2023
Merged

Principle on fake consent #290

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

dmarti
Copy link
Collaborator

@dmarti dmarti commented Jun 28, 2023

Simplify the fake consent problem, new language

Fixes #192


Preview | Diff

Simplify the fake consent problem, new language

Fixes #192
index.html Outdated
<p>
<span class="practicelab" id="principle-fake-consent">
An [=actor=] should not prompt a [=person=] for consent if the
person is unlikely to have sufficient information to make an informed decision to consent or not.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
person is unlikely to have sufficient information to make an informed decision to consent or not.
person is unlikely to have sufficient information to make an informed decision to consent or not.

index.html Outdated
</p>
</div>

In considering whether or not a person is sufficiently informed to be promoted for consent,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure I get what it mean to be promoted for consent?

index.html Outdated
actors should be realistic in comparing [=privacy labour=] required with actual user time spent in
the relevant context.
Simply providing a link to a complex policy is unlikely to mean that the person is
informed, if the policy takes half an hour to read and the average site visit is ten minutes.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure that I love this measure. I don't want to spend 30min reading a complex policy even for a site that I use every day!

@dmarti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dmarti commented Jun 28, 2023

Remove number of minutes, change to reasonable

Make this into explanatory text for first principle in section

Make this into explanatory text for first principle in the section.

Simplify text as discussed in recent meeting
@dmarti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dmarti commented Jul 5, 2023

@darobin Made changes that should address your comments here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@npdoty npdoty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good. works better as explanatory text, thanks for making the change.

Copy link
Member

@torgo torgo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jyasskin jyasskin merged commit 379d536 into main Jul 5, 2023
1 check passed
@jyasskin jyasskin deleted the fix-192 branch July 5, 2023 16:07
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2023
SHA: 379d536
Reason: push, by jyasskin

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Don't ask for fake consent, even if real consent is not required
5 participants