Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] MSC3865: User-given attributes for users #3865

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Zocker1999NET
Copy link

@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET commented Aug 9, 2022

Signed-off-by: Felix Stupp [email protected]

@Zocker1999NET Zocker1999NET changed the title [WIP] MSCXXXX: User-given attributes for users [WIP] MSC3865: User-given attributes for users Aug 9, 2022
Zocker1999NET added a commit to Zocker1999NET/matrix-spec-proposals that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2022
user's user-given attributes now defined in
[MSC3865](matrix-org#3865)
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Aug 9, 2022
@dklimpel
Copy link
Contributor

Related to:

@Mart-Bogdan
Copy link

As I understend size of single item in User Config is limited at 64 KiB

https://matrix.to/#/!NasysSDfxKxZBzJJoE:matrix.org/$ArNvLz_XK2CoXVb64g99ns6o-8DYIbDz0Ze_6NXMBaI?via=matrix.org&via=envs.net&via=element.io

So it can be an issue if somebody store too much data in m.user_given.user.description

Perhaps we need to store data for each user individually? like m.user_given.@alice:example.com.description.

Sadly it would explode amount of user data stored, IDK if this can cause problems.

Other option is to create m.user_given.user.description.2 when first one run out of storage.

@tusooa
Copy link
Contributor

tusooa commented Jun 7, 2024

Just so you know, I am implementing this in kazv: https://iron.lily-is.land/T77

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants